Since Monday, March 27, Prince Harry is in the United Kingdom. Unexpected, this passage in his native country questions the British press. Come to attend preliminary hearings on his complaint against the Associated Newspapers Limited, was the husband of Meghan Markle planned to eclipse the state visit of Charles III in France, postponed at the last moment?
Anything for the spotlight. Since this Monday, March 27, Prince Harry is panicking the British press. After six months without setting foot in his native country, the youngest son of Charles III opted for the surprise effect by appearing at the Royal Court of Justice in London. Having come to attend four days of hearings meant to determine whether a lawsuit pitting Meghan Markle’s husband and six other celebrities against the media publisher Associated Newspapers Limited is necessary, would Lady Diana’s son have calculated this appearance? In today’s Telegraph, the question arises given that his father would normally be in France for a state visit. Did the American exile want to overshadow the monarch?
What is certain is that Archie and Lilibet Diana’s father had no choice regarding the date of the preliminary hearings. However, none of the personalities who filed the complaint were obliged to attend. Harry knew perfectly well that Charles III would be busy overseas, with his first official trip as sovereign, the English newspaper points out. But two days before this important meeting, Emmanuel Macron preferred to postpone, seeing the tensions concerning the highly contested pension reform increase in view of his lunch at the Palace of Versailles with the king.
Did Harry want to disrupt the “operation seduction” of Charles III in France?
Was Prince Harry aware that his surprise appearance in London would certainly disrupt the “European seduction operation” of his father? Nothing is less sure. But Buckingham Palace will undoubtedly have noted the strange coincidence, perhaps thought in order to eclipse Charles III. In this case, a point of no return seems to have been exceeded in the father-son relationship, largely distended since three years with the voluntary exile of Meghan and Harry in the United States.
It must be said that many notable events have complicated the ties between the Sussexes and the members of the Crown since the funeral of Elizabeth II, in September 2022. The Duke and Duchess unveiled their Netflix documentary series and the Prince published his explosive memoir in which he unfilteredly reveals the tensions within the Firm. Recently, Princess Lilibet Diana was baptized in California, without the welcome presence of Charles III, Queen Consort Camille or her heirs, Prince William and Kate Middleton. Would there be only ashes left of the once close relationship between Harry and his family? The coronation of the monarch, on May 6, will perhaps be the occasion to revive them…
Photo credits: Agency / Bestimage
I am tired of the discord Harry and Meghan have cost the Royal Family and I am tired of King Charles not standing up to H & M’s lies and cruelty to the Citizens of both the United Kingdom and the United States. Remove their names from the guest list and stop them from attending the Coronation!
This who article seems to try and stir the pot. Harry will never eclipse the RF, but rather show his ignorance. If they come to the coronation both H&M will say the RF did not want their kids there. This is all KC or the RF fault they never saw them. When I think instead H&M are throwing up a smoke screen trying to figure out what to do, because they don’t have kids from them, born from her. Easy to blame someone else for the trouble you started, when you thousands of miles away.